Since the beginning of PSA Panama, we have operated the port under a concession awarded by the State of Panama. Generally, concessions are a legal framework that the State of Panama has granted to several port operators located in the former Canal Zone.
However, despite the social and legal license of PSA Panama, some businessmen and politicians have tried to intervene against this concession to advance different interests. In this space, we will expose the resolved complaints and other actions that we are implementing to shield the port operation in these cases.
Gantry Cranes
RTG Cranes
RMG Cranes
Collaborators
Million
Investment
Through Law 36 of June 19, 2008, the National Assembly approves the Concession Contract between PSA and the Panamanian State, which authorizes PSA to operate the Port in Rodman.
The terminal began operating in 2010, receiving supplies, including iron material, utilized for the expansion of the Panama Canal.
Fuente de la imagen: PSA Panama
PSA announces its interest in expanding the operation and adding an additional area of 31 hectares for this purpose.
Fuente de la imagen: Capital Financiero
The Maritime Authority of Panama (AMP) requests the Unidad Administrativa de Bienes Revertidos of the MEF to carry out the necessary procedures to transfer to the AMP the area that would be assigned to the PSA concession.
Fuente de la imagen: La Estrella de Panamá
AMP and PSA agree to celebrate a Contract Law for the construction and operation of a port terminal, with previous approval from the General Comptroller and of the National Assembly.
Fuente de la imagen: AMP website
The Cabinet Council approves through Resolution No. 58 of April 8, 2014 the contract between AMP and PSA, and authorizes the Secretariat of the Presidency to present the bill before the National Assembly, once the Comptroller's Office endorses it.
Fuente de la imagen: Tu Política
The Comptroller's Office informs the AMP that the area under concession to PSA, is still under concession to PIMPSA (former concessionaire of the land). Accordingly, the addendum process must be completed first with PIMPSA to release the assets and then grant them to PSA.
Fuente de la imagen: Panamá Today
The Comptroller's Office, requests the Ministry of Economy and Finance to complete the addendum process with PIMPSA to grant the concession to PSA.
Fuente de la imagen: D Panamá News
On October 28, the Comptroller's Office endorses the Contract Law A 2005-2014 between the Panamanian State and PSA.
Fuente de la imagen: TVN Noticias
The Cabinet authorizes the Minister of the Secretariat of the Presidency to propose to the National Assembly, the bill that approves the Contract A 2005-2014 between the Panamanian State and PSA.
Fuente de la imagen: BL Es News
The legislative body, approves in first debate, the Project Law N ° 122 which approves the Contract A 2005-2014 between the Panamanian State and PSA.
Fuente de la imagen: Panama Today
On February 10, Law 2 is passed approving the Contract A 2005-2014, signed between the Panamanian State and PSA.
Fuente de la imagen: Critica
ACP and PSA enter into a concession contract on an area adjacent to the land given in concession by the Panamanian State, at the Rodman Base.
Fuente de la imagen: La Estrella de Panamá
The lawyer and politician, Miguel Antonio Bernal questions the validity of the MEF resolution which assigns the AMP the use and administration of certain lands to celebrate the Contract Law with PSA. The Anti-Corruption Office, requested the provisional dismissal of the case, which was later confirmed by the Eleventh Criminal Court of Panama.
Fuente de la imagen: TVN Noticias
PSA began the expansion of the terminal to increase the number of vessels and the cargo volume.
Fuente de la imagen: La Estrella de Panamá
Alexis Zuleta, former Director of Public Tenders, filed a lawsuit before the Third Chamber of the Supreme Court to annul Contract A-2005-2014, arguing that the AMP didn´t offer a public tender procedure to grant the concession. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of PSA and the case was dismissed, since the concession law doesn´t require a public tender to grant a concession.
Fuente de la imagen: Diario Las Américas
Zuleta files a new complaint before the nine judges of the Supreme Court, declaring that the provisions of the Contract Law violated articles of the National Constitution, stating that the National Assembly exceeded its power by approving a contract where the State is a participant. The Supreme Court requested an opinion from the Office of the Comptroller General, which confirmed that the law followed all the required steps and the Assembly only has the right to approve or reject it. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of PSA, stating that the Law Contract is constitutional.
Fuente de la imagen: Agencia EFE
Crispiano Adames, PRD deputy of the National Assembly, introduces Draft Bill No. 39 to repeal Law 2 of February 10, 2015, arguing that the Contract Law was not fully discussed in the Assembly. The Economic Affairs Committee did not discuss the Draft Bill during the last legislative term and it expired.
Fuente de la imagen: Metro Libre
Irving Ríos, deputy of the National Assembly for the PRD party, introduces Bill No. 81 to repeal Law 2 of February 10, 2015. This project expired since the Economic Affairs Committee did not discuss it.
Fuente de la imagen: Tu Política
Zuleta filed a lawsuit before the Supreme Court stating that the Contract Law has unconstitutional clauses since PSA is entitled to charge commercial rates and decide prices for any importer / exporter to use the terminal. The Attorney General stated that no clause can be understood as a privilege given that the company is providing a service within a commercial framework in a country of free competition. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of PSA, declaring that the clauses of the Contract Law are not unconstitutional.
Fuente de la imagen: La Prensa
The attorneys Guillermo Cochez and Víctor Martínez filed a complaint with the Attorney General of the Criminal Office to request that the process of awarding the previous and current concession in the Rodman area be investigated, also pointing out a supposed association between PIMPSA and PSA. The case was dismissed considering the allegations used were already tried in previous cases, therefore the Criminal Office dismissed the complaint.
Fuente de la imagen: Elclick.news
Cochez and Martínez filed an unconstitutionality lawsuit with the Supreme Court, alleging that PSA acquired ownership of a part of national land and that PSA has relations with the State of Singapore. Likewise, they argued that in the Contract Law, a concession is granted to a company in which a foreign government maintains economic interests.
Fuente de la imagen: Judicial Authority
On April 19, 2018, while the Assembly debated Draft Bill No. 53 related to commercial activities in residential areas, the legislator Roberto Ayala, member of the PRD, introduced in this bill, an article that repeals the Contract Law of PSA and the bill was approved by the Assembly without any debate. Article 148 of the Assembly's internal regulation manual stipulates that an unrelated provision is not allowed to be incorporated into a law.
Fuente de la imagen: TVN Noticias
On May 29, 2018, President Juan Carlos Varela vetoed Bill 53 of 2018, which repealed the PSA port concession by objecting, among others, to article 6 of said bill that repealed Law 2 of 2015. The Presidency of the Republic explained that the Constitution, in its Article 276, prohibits the Assembly from issuing laws that repeal or modify income contemplated in the General Budget of the State.
Fuente de la imagen: TVN Noticias
The Supreme Court released a Resolution establishing that they will not admit the unconstitutionality claim submitted jointly by Cochez and Martinez in July 2017. The Resolution was published on October 1, 2018.
Fuente de la imagen: Crítica